MTGGoldfish is supported by its audience. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn a commission.
Browse > Home / Strategy / Draft Statistics / Magic 2014 x3
Battle for Zendikar | Magic Origins | Dragons of Tarkir | more

Limited Analysis: Draft Magic 2014 x3

This data was collected by parsing Magic Online release drafts and seeing what cards were played. The usual disclaimer on card Win% for sweepers, overrun effects and other conditional effects. Note Win% on the Play/Draw is calculated with only the first game of each match.

Summary

Games Analyzed
7,450
Last Updated
2014-02-08

Game Length

Average Turns
10.1
Average Lands Played
6.6

Play or Draw?

Win % on the Play
46.2%
Win % on the Draw
53.8%

Mulligans

Mulligan to 6 5 4 3
Win % Average 35.60% 22.80% 13.00% 0.00%
Win % on the Play 33.30% 16.00% 8.30% 0.00%
Win % on the Draw 37.90% 28.30% 18.20% 0.00%
Games 2,424 167 23 5

Win Percentage by Color

49.1%
49.9%
51.4%
49.0%
49.6%

Top Cards

Card Cost Games Likely Win %
1 Kalonian Hydra 124 69.00%
2 Lifebane Zombie 253 66.00%
3 Scourge of Valkas 109 66.00%
4 Garruk, Caller of Beasts 61 63.00%
5 Shadowborn Demon 88 63.00%

Top Commons

Card Cost Games Likely Win %
1 Essence Scatter 1311 61.00%
2 Accursed Spirit 1437 61.00%
3 Mark of the Vampire 1204 61.00%
4 Rumbling Baloth 1439 60.00%
5 Blood Bairn 1350 60.00%

Top Uncommons

Card Cost Games Likely Win %
1 Flames of the Firebrand 693 62.00%
2 Air Servant 741 62.00%
3 Tenacious Dead 813 61.00%
4 Enlarge 473 60.00%
5 Gnawing Zombie 678 59.00%
See All Card Stats >>

Archetypes

Colors Win % Field % Games
55.80% 0.90% 120
55.20% 6.70% 940
53.80% 9.40% 1,317
53.70% 2.10% 294
53.40% 7.00% 977
50.80% 5.70% 797
50.30% 6.20% 864
50.20% 10.10% 1,415
49.90% 4.20% 595
49.70% 6.70% 942
49.40% 2.20% 312
49.10% 3.70% 521
49.00% 5.30% 743
48.70% 5.90% 826
48.60% 4.50% 636
48.40% 3.40% 471
46.70% 1.90% 272
46.10% 0.80% 115
46.10% 6.20% 872
45.40% 2.90% 403
45.00% 1.90% 271
44.60% 0.40% 56
42.30% 0.70% 104
41.30% 0.50% 75
41.30% 0.40% 63

* This is derived from replay data of drafts. This has the limitation of only seeing cards in play (you cannot see cards in hand in replays). This means there is a bias for expensive impactful cards. For example, Boulderfall is a very expensive ( ) and impactful card. When you do play it, you will probably win the game (as evidenced by the high win percentage). However, we cannot see all the games where it was stranded in your hand and it cost you the game. Thus the data is a bit biased towards expensive, impactful cards.

Layout Footer

Never miss important MTG news again!

All emails include an unsubscribe link. You may opt-out at any time. See our privacy policy.

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Twitch
  • Instagram
  • Tumblr
  • RSS
  • Email
  • Discord
  • YouTube

Price Preference

Default Price Switcher